Tv tropes presentable liberty tv#

During the 2020 election cycle as well as the aftermath, they not only deny there being rampant voter fraud despite sufficient evidence coming in independently of what Trump stated that the election was stolen, but even went as far as to implicitly accuse Donald Trump of telling Republicans to engage in such, while also ignoring Democrats' attempts at voter fraud or downplaying it by claiming they're the victim of it. It also calls 'cure your gays' a 'discredited' trope despite the fact that ex-homosexuals do exist. Similarly, despite having a rule forbidding listing any real-world examples that are more recent than four decades, the Vote Early, Vote Often trope page's real life examples section explicitly rejects the notion that voter fraud was widespread (as well as citing the fake news site Washington Post as its proof for being rare) during the 2010 decade and falsely implies that Republicans and Conservatives simply were 'delusional' for believing it, and even accusing the Republican congressional candidate of North Carolina of doing the same. On these pages, the 'Rule of Cautious Editing Judgment' and their rule against 'Complaining About Shows You Don't Like' are disregarded. They are also pro-evolution and anti-Christian as can be seen on their tropes page for Christian movies like God's Not Dead. For instance, some of the tropes, in particular YMMV tropes, can make negative statements about President Bush, yet if a negative statement was made regarding Barack Obama, they remove it under the pretense of how it's never good to negatively comment on a President anything negative about Donald Trump is promoted, while anything positive about him is either removed or edited out of context. The site tends to promote several liberal biases.

Tv tropes presentable liberty tv#

Although TV Tropes eventually became so mismanaged that All The Tropes (later Tropedia) was created specifically to fix mistakes made on TV Tropes, it has recently started falling into the same problems with the Complete Monster trope as with TV Tropes, including utilizing differing moral standards for villains, with it eventually resulting in the outright removal of the Complete Monster trope from being used as examples on All the Tropes (and the trope itself only being relegated to a single article).

In addition, despite qualifying as YMMV, several entries relating to unintentionally sympathetic or unintentionally unsympathetic at times get removed due to the claim that they are insulting to the characters. In addition, this also results in various other Wikias, such as Villains Wiki, using the Complete Monster trope alongside rigidly enforcing these aspects even when they were incorrect and in explicit violation against Wikia's encyclopedic policies on POV, and also tended to require majority opinion to even qualify (see also Groupthink). This also ends up contradicted when one character is labeled as a Complete Monster and the other in exactly the same work isn't considered such despite both characters doing exactly the same sort of thing that got one of them labeled as such in the first place and having very similar reactions. One of the excuses for this inconsistency is the claim that different stories have differing moral standards, implying that they engage in Moral relativism. An infamous example of this is the Complete Monster trope, reserved for the worst of the worst among villains, where some villains get removed for qualifying as 'lacking in the heinous standard' even when said villains have been depicted as being truly evil, such as outright enjoying jobs at assassination and having zero qualms with murdering children, or even having another qualifying despite their showing genuinely redeemable traits. In certain cases, in particular with YMMV tropes, the criteria used for determining trope applicability have been deemed inconsistent, even when there was a rubric for including them. The official policy is that 'There Is No Such Thing As Notability', the only qualifying factor for page creation is that the subject must actually exist.Ī non-fiction educational wiki has been shoe-horned into TV Tropes as a way for the liberal editors to criticize it. Effectively every individual scene, character or theme, no matter how specific, can be turned into an article, even if they are not tropes as such. As a result, most of the entries are over specialized variations of other entries. Consequently, they need excuses to make new pages.

Users of the site have too much time on their hands and are obsessed with television shows, such as the vacuous occult teen drama Buffy the Vampire Slayer.

Lively set of forums to coordinate editing.

Not quite as stuffy or encyclopedic as Wikipedia.

Hanging a Lampshade on Fiction: The Good TV Tropes Does

1 Hanging a Lampshade on Fiction: The Good TV Tropes Does.